From FMMC0104
- 16:56, 4 November 2010 diff hist 0 m ESPN Unprotected "ESPN"
- 18:58, 30 October 2010 diff hist +614 N Talk:HBO New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid report, with good research and details. However, there is too much repetition throughout, and at times, information is presented without enough analysis and...
- 12:57, 30 October 2010 diff hist +339 Talk:Showtime →Report #1
- 12:56, 30 October 2010 diff hist +201 N Talk:Showtime New page: == Report #1 == This report contains solid details and information, but does not always present them as clearly as it could - there's not clear enough structure for how your points should ...
- 12:30, 30 October 2010 diff hist +418 N Talk:VH1 New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid report, with good sources and details, and effective analysis. Avoid using lists to "info dump," but incorporate relevant information into your analysis. Be...
- 12:19, 30 October 2010 diff hist +659 N Talk:FX New page: == Report #1 == This report has strong research and some solid details, but falls short of the assignment's goals. The structure is too redundant & repetitive, resorting to lists of inform...
- 12:02, 30 October 2010 diff hist +705 N Talk:ESPN New page: == Report #1 == This report contains some good details and clear writing, but lacks sufficient analysis - it feels too much like a "data dump" of information rather than a consideration of...
- 11:09, 30 October 2010 diff hist +469 N Talk:Disney Channel New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for...
- 09:36, 30 October 2010 diff hist +499 N Talk:Discovery Channel New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid report, with good details and a clear structure. You should look for sources beyond the channel's website to get a better sense of how its strategies fit in...
- 19:07, 29 October 2010 diff hist +821 N Talk:Comedy Central New page: == Report #1 == This report features good details and solid research, with a clear structure. However the writing is too much like a "PR pitch" and less like academic analysis - you overus...
- 16:22, 28 October 2010 diff hist +92 Talk:Food Network
- 16:22, 28 October 2010 diff hist +440 N Talk:Food Network New page: == Report #1 == This is a strong account of the industrial details of the channel, with good resources. You could discuss target demographics more clearly, identifying how the shoppers int...
- 16:02, 28 October 2010 diff hist 0 m Food Network Unprotected "Food Network"
- 16:02, 28 October 2010 diff hist 0 m Showtime Unprotected "Showtime"
- 16:02, 28 October 2010 diff hist 0 m HBO Unprotected "HBO"
- 16:02, 28 October 2010 diff hist 0 m Discovery Channel Unprotected "Discovery Channel"
- 16:01, 28 October 2010 diff hist 0 m VH1 Unprotected "VH1"
- 16:01, 28 October 2010 diff hist 0 m FX Unprotected "FX"
- 16:01, 28 October 2010 diff hist 0 m Disney Channel Unprotected "Disney Channel"
- 16:00, 28 October 2010 diff hist 0 m Animal Planet Unprotected "Animal Planet"