From FMMC0104
(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | older 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 13:27, 24 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+484) . . Talk:Comedy Central (→Report #2 and 3) (current)
- 16:55, 23 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (-1) . . Talk:Comedy Central (→Report #2 and 3)
- 16:55, 23 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+146) . . Talk:Comedy Central (→Report #1)
- 11:39, 23 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+738) . . Talk:CNN (→Report #1) (current)
- 11:20, 23 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+438) . . Talk:Cartoon Network (→Report #1) (current)
- 10:45, 23 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+489) . . Talk:Bravo (→Report #1) (current)
- 18:04, 22 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+431) . . Talk:BBC America (current)
- 17:56, 22 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+34) . . Talk:Animal Planet (→Reports #2 & 3) (current)
- 17:54, 22 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+537) . . Talk:Animal Planet (→Report #1)
- 19:29, 21 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+808) . . Talk:ABC Family (current)
- 16:56, 4 November 2010 (diff | hist) . . (0) . . m ESPN (Unprotected "ESPN")
- 18:58, 30 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+614) . . N Talk:HBO (New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid report, with good research and details. However, there is too much repetition throughout, and at times, information is presented without enough analysis and...)
- 12:57, 30 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+339) . . Talk:Showtime (→Report #1)
- 12:56, 30 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+201) . . N Talk:Showtime (New page: == Report #1 == This report contains solid details and information, but does not always present them as clearly as it could - there's not clear enough structure for how your points should ...)
- 12:30, 30 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+418) . . N Talk:VH1 (New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid report, with good sources and details, and effective analysis. Avoid using lists to "info dump," but incorporate relevant information into your analysis. Be...)
- 12:19, 30 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+659) . . N Talk:FX (New page: == Report #1 == This report has strong research and some solid details, but falls short of the assignment's goals. The structure is too redundant & repetitive, resorting to lists of inform...)
- 12:02, 30 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+705) . . N Talk:ESPN (New page: == Report #1 == This report contains some good details and clear writing, but lacks sufficient analysis - it feels too much like a "data dump" of information rather than a consideration of...)
- 11:09, 30 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+469) . . N Talk:Disney Channel (New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for...)
- 09:36, 30 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+499) . . N Talk:Discovery Channel (New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid report, with good details and a clear structure. You should look for sources beyond the channel's website to get a better sense of how its strategies fit in...)
- 19:07, 29 October 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+821) . . N Talk:Comedy Central (New page: == Report #1 == This report features good details and solid research, with a clear structure. However the writing is too much like a "PR pitch" and less like academic analysis - you overus...)
(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | older 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)