(New page: == Report #1 == This is a strong account of an interesting hybrid example of a national/global channel, with good research and clear structure. You repeat a bit too much throughout, a comm...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Report #1 == | == Report #1 == | ||
This is a strong account of an interesting hybrid example of a national/global channel, with good research and clear structure. You repeat a bit too much throughout, a common outcome of having people write separate sections - try to make sure somebody does a final edit for consistency and redundancy. Your presentation was solid with good details, although there was also too much repetition there as well. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 00:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | This is a strong account of an interesting hybrid example of a national/global channel, with good research and clear structure. You repeat a bit too much throughout, a common outcome of having people write separate sections - try to make sure somebody does a final edit for consistency and redundancy. Your presentation was solid with good details, although there was also too much repetition there as well. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 00:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Reports #2 & 3 == | ||
| + | These are a strong pair of reports, with clear details, good analysis, and effective writing. Be sure to edit for clarity and avoiding repetition, but generally these are in solid shape. Your presentations were solid, although a bit thin in the analysis of ''Top Gear'' - be sure to avoid too much reading from notes in your presentations. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 22:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:04, 22 November 2010
Report #1
This is a strong account of an interesting hybrid example of a national/global channel, with good research and clear structure. You repeat a bit too much throughout, a common outcome of having people write separate sections - try to make sure somebody does a final edit for consistency and redundancy. Your presentation was solid with good details, although there was also too much repetition there as well. --Jason Mittell 00:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Reports #2 & 3
These are a strong pair of reports, with clear details, good analysis, and effective writing. Be sure to edit for clarity and avoiding repetition, but generally these are in solid shape. Your presentations were solid, although a bit thin in the analysis of Top Gear - be sure to avoid too much reading from notes in your presentations. --Jason Mittell 22:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)