From FMMC0104
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid account of the channel, with some good sources and clear details. Listing demographics doesn't add anything to your account - and the source is actually abo...)
 
(Report #1)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Report #1 ==
 
== Report #1 ==
 
This is a solid account of the channel, with some good sources and clear details. Listing demographics doesn't add anything to your account - and the source is actually about the CartoonNetwork.com website, not the TV channel itself. You need to deepen your analysis more than just reporting on information, exploring why it's undertaken certain strategies & approaches, and be sure to avoid repetition. Your presentation was well-detailed & clear. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 01:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
This is a solid account of the channel, with some good sources and clear details. Listing demographics doesn't add anything to your account - and the source is actually about the CartoonNetwork.com website, not the TV channel itself. You need to deepen your analysis more than just reporting on information, exploring why it's undertaken certain strategies & approaches, and be sure to avoid repetition. Your presentation was well-detailed & clear. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 01:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Report #2 and 3 ==
 +
These are solid reports with good details & effective structure. At times there's a lack of clarity in the analysis, such as in the section discussing the Tyler Perry parody, so be sure to revise appropriately, as well as proofreading for typos and misspellings. Your presentations were effectively detailed and offered good analysis throughout. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 15:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:20, 23 November 2010

Report #1

This is a solid account of the channel, with some good sources and clear details. Listing demographics doesn't add anything to your account - and the source is actually about the CartoonNetwork.com website, not the TV channel itself. You need to deepen your analysis more than just reporting on information, exploring why it's undertaken certain strategies & approaches, and be sure to avoid repetition. Your presentation was well-detailed & clear. --Jason Mittell 01:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Report #2 and 3

These are solid reports with good details & effective structure. At times there's a lack of clarity in the analysis, such as in the section discussing the Tyler Perry parody, so be sure to revise appropriately, as well as proofreading for typos and misspellings. Your presentations were effectively detailed and offered good analysis throughout. --Jason Mittell 15:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)