From FMMC0104
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid report, with good details and a clear structure. You should look for sources beyond the channel's website to get a better sense of how its strategies fit in...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Report #1 ==
 
== Report #1 ==
 
This is a solid report, with good details and a clear structure. You should look for sources beyond the channel's website to get a better sense of how its strategies fit into broader trends and contexts, and try to offer more analysis of the details you discuss. Be sure to more effectively proofread for typos, and italicize all TV show titles throughout. Your presentation was effectively structured and detailed. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 13:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 
This is a solid report, with good details and a clear structure. You should look for sources beyond the channel's website to get a better sense of how its strategies fit into broader trends and contexts, and try to offer more analysis of the details you discuss. Be sure to more effectively proofread for typos, and italicize all TV show titles throughout. Your presentation was effectively structured and detailed. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 13:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Report #2 & 3 ==
 +
These reports highlight some good details about the shows and connect to the channel's industrial strategy, but parts are underdeveloped. You don't discuss the issue of co-production of ''Life'' sufficiently, and your discussion of the online presence doesn't really account for viewer participation and engagement - expand these points in your final revision. Your presentations were mixed, with a strong 2nd one about ''Deadliest Catch'' but a weaker overview of the website. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 19:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:10, 24 November 2010

Report #1

This is a solid report, with good details and a clear structure. You should look for sources beyond the channel's website to get a better sense of how its strategies fit into broader trends and contexts, and try to offer more analysis of the details you discuss. Be sure to more effectively proofread for typos, and italicize all TV show titles throughout. Your presentation was effectively structured and detailed. --Jason Mittell 13:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Report #2 & 3

These reports highlight some good details about the shows and connect to the channel's industrial strategy, but parts are underdeveloped. You don't discuss the issue of co-production of Life sufficiently, and your discussion of the online presence doesn't really account for viewer participation and engagement - expand these points in your final revision. Your presentations were mixed, with a strong 2nd one about Deadliest Catch but a weaker overview of the website. --Jason Mittell 19:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)