(New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Report #1 == | == Report #1 == | ||
This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for consistent tone & format, avoiding long paragraphs and making sure to italicize titles consistently throughout. Your presentation was good, although be sure to plan a bit more to avoid overrunning the time limit. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 15:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC) | This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for consistent tone & format, avoiding long paragraphs and making sure to italicize titles consistently throughout. Your presentation was good, although be sure to plan a bit more to avoid overrunning the time limit. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 15:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Report #2 & 3 == | ||
| + | These are a strong pair of reports, with good details and analysis throughout. You should streamline your source citations throughout, to use a consist format of either footnotes or parenthetical citations. Your presentations were both strong as well, with clear and details points presented effectively. Nice work! --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 19:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:21, 24 November 2010
Report #1
This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for consistent tone & format, avoiding long paragraphs and making sure to italicize titles consistently throughout. Your presentation was good, although be sure to plan a bit more to avoid overrunning the time limit. --Jason Mittell 15:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Report #2 & 3
These are a strong pair of reports, with good details and analysis throughout. You should streamline your source citations throughout, to use a consist format of either footnotes or parenthetical citations. Your presentations were both strong as well, with clear and details points presented effectively. Nice work! --Jason Mittell 19:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)