From FMMC0104
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: == Report #1 == This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for...)
 
(Report #1)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Report #1 ==
 
== Report #1 ==
 
This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for consistent tone & format, avoiding long paragraphs and making sure to italicize titles consistently throughout. Your presentation was good, although be sure to plan a bit more to avoid overrunning the time limit. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 15:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 
This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for consistent tone & format, avoiding long paragraphs and making sure to italicize titles consistently throughout. Your presentation was good, although be sure to plan a bit more to avoid overrunning the time limit. --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 15:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Report #2 & 3 ==
 +
These are a strong pair of reports, with good details and analysis throughout. You should streamline your source citations throughout, to use a consist format of either footnotes or parenthetical citations. Your presentations were both strong as well, with clear and details points presented effectively. Nice work! --[[User:Jason Mittell|Jason Mittell]] 19:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:21, 24 November 2010

Report #1

This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for consistent tone & format, avoiding long paragraphs and making sure to italicize titles consistently throughout. Your presentation was good, although be sure to plan a bit more to avoid overrunning the time limit. --Jason Mittell 15:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Report #2 & 3

These are a strong pair of reports, with good details and analysis throughout. You should streamline your source citations throughout, to use a consist format of either footnotes or parenthetical citations. Your presentations were both strong as well, with clear and details points presented effectively. Nice work! --Jason Mittell 19:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)