From FMMC0104
Revision as of 15:21, 24 November 2010 by Jason Mittell (talk | contribs) (Report #1)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Report #1

This is a solid account of the channel, with excellent research and good analysis in points. The report is erratic in its writing - be sure to have one person proofread for consistent tone & format, avoiding long paragraphs and making sure to italicize titles consistently throughout. Your presentation was good, although be sure to plan a bit more to avoid overrunning the time limit. --Jason Mittell 15:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Report #2 & 3

These are a strong pair of reports, with good details and analysis throughout. You should streamline your source citations throughout, to use a consist format of either footnotes or parenthetical citations. Your presentations were both strong as well, with clear and details points presented effectively. Nice work! --Jason Mittell 19:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)