An Inconvenient Truth

From International Political Economy
Revision as of 20:32, 26 November 2010 by Kaitlynn Saldanha (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” discusses the implications of what would happen if we, globally, do not take a more proactive stance to combat climate change. He makes extremely exaggerated claims, according to Bjørn Lomborg. “While it’s nice to see Gore bucking the trend in a nation where many influential people deny that global warming even exists, many of his apocalyptic claims are highly misleading. But his biggest error lies in suggesting that humanity has a moral imperative to act on climate change because we realize there is a problem. This seems naïve, even disingenuous.”[1] Lomborg claims that morality is not the issue. The movie’s premise, to Lomborg, was to make “three points: global warming is real; it will be catastrophic; and addressing it should be our top priority.”[2] He believes that, “Inconveniently for the film’s producers, however, only the first statement is correct.”[3] Lomborg continues in his article “Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore” to explain where Gore’s data falters, giving concrete evidence from the United Nations Panel concerning global warming.

Lomborg argues that in the film, Gore indeed presents disturbing “consequences of the sea level rising 20 feet (seven meters), flooding large parts of Florida, San Francisco, New York, Holland, Calcutta, Beijing, and Shanghai.”[4] He questions, “Were realistic levels not dramatic enough? The United Nations panel on climate change suggests a rise of only 1-2 feet during this century, compared to almost one foot in the last century”.[5] Additionally, Gore exaggerated other aspects of his argument. He preaches about the horrors Antarctica will face associated with global warming, but in reality, his data is skewed. He fails to mention that only 2% of Antarctica is rapidly warming, whereas the other 98% has actually gotten colder in the last half-century. According to Lomborg, “The UN climate panel estimates that Antarctica’s snow mass will actually increase during this century. And, whereas Gore points to shrinking sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere, he fails to mention that ice in the Southern Hemisphere is increasing.”[6] Gore needs to get his facts together if he wants to accurately persuade the public about the horrors that civilization faces. Lomborg does not argue that there is no such thing as climate change, but he reasonably argues that the picture Gore paints is not entirely factual.


References

  1. Lomborg, Bjørn. “Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore.” Project Syndicate. 2006.
  2. Lomborg, Bjørn. “Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore.” Project Syndicate. 2006.
  3. Lomborg, Bjørn. “Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore.” Project Syndicate. 2006.
  4. Lomborg, Bjørn. “Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore.” Project Syndicate. 2006.
  5. Lomborg, Bjørn. “Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore.” Project Syndicate. 2006.
  6. Lomborg, Bjørn. “Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore.” Project Syndicate. 2006.