Benjamin Cohen on the problems of International Monetary Cooperation

From International Political Economy
Revision as of 23:35, 24 September 2010 by Mehdi Prevot (talk | contribs) (New page: This page is an attempt to summarize Benjamin Cohen's essay entitled "The Triad and the Unholy Trinity: Problems of International Monetary Cooperation." Cohen starts with a very simple fa...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

This page is an attempt to summarize Benjamin Cohen's essay entitled "The Triad and the Unholy Trinity: Problems of International Monetary Cooperation."

Cohen starts with a very simple fact: "international monetary cooperation {...} is a good thing but difficult to sustain." [1] or him, the reason for this difficulty lies in the incompatibility of the three key desiderata of government, namely the exchange-rate stability, the capital mobility and the national policy autonomy. Clearly, he asserts that this "Unholy Trinity" is responsible for the shirking of states vis-à-vis their collective commitments to monetary cooperation.

1. The Case for Policy Cooperation:

After presenting his thesis, he first gives his definition of the word "cooperation" so as to avoid any confusion: "coope


REFERENCES

  1. Frieden, Jeffry A, and David A. Lake. International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2000. Print. p.246