Difference between revisions of "Bi-metallism"

From International Political Economy
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Historically, Bi-Metallism was a currency standard that pegged currencies to two different metals, commonly silver and gold. The standard became largely unpopular and died out over the course of the 19th century as governments and empires became more acutely aware of the serious flaws inherent in it. The biggest problem with the system is articulated in Gresham's Law and it goes like this. Once someone became aware of the discrepancies between the market price and the official value of gold or silver, it was extremely easy to take advantage, and profit from the system. For example, a mint would issue a certain rate for silver and gold. Say the official bank/mint rate for silver was higher than the global market price for silver. Anyone looking to make a profit could trade in their silver for gold at the mint rate and then go to the global market and trade in their gold for silver. They would then have more silver than they originally had to begin with. Repeat this cycle enough times and you make a significant profit. They would return to the bank with a higher quantity of silver and get gold and return to the market. With enough people doing this, one of the two metals would quickly go out of circulation in the domestic market. The mint takes in a lot of silver as everyone wants to exchange for gold so that they can turn a profit in the international market. The result is that the undervalued currency, gold, gets sucked out to foreign markets where it is valued higher.
+
Historically, Bi-Metallism was a currency standard that pegged currencies to either silver or gold. The standard became largely unpopular and died out over the course of the 19th century once governments and empires became aware of its inherent flaws. Its most apparent problem is articulated in Gresham's Law. According to Gresham, once a person becomes aware that there are discrepancies between the market price and the official value of gold or silver, it is extremely easy to take advantage and profit from the system. To better understand this theory, take the example of a mint, which would issue a certain rate for silver and gold. Say the official bank or mint rate for silver is higher than the global market price for silver. Anyone looking to make a profit could trade in their silver for gold at the mint rate and then go to the global market and trade in his or her gold for silver. They would then have more silver than they originally had to begin. A significant profit can be reaped if someone abuses his or her knowledge of this inconsistency. If enough people do this, the circulation of silver or gold could potentially dissolve from the domestic market. Silver generally flows readily into the mint, as the majority of consumers would rather exchange it for gold with the hope of turning a profit in the international market. As a result, gold, as the undervalued currency, gets sucked into foreign markets where it is valued higher. This discrepancy was unavoidable because official values of gold and silver were fixed while the prices of gold and silver fluctuated due to their resource-status. Fluctuation in price level, however, is a natural inevitability of the laws of supply and demand.  
This discrepancy was unavoidable because official values of gold and silver were fixed while the prices of gold and silver fluctuated due to the fact that both are resources and fluctuation in price level is a natural inevitability of the laws of supply and demand. It grew increasingly difficult to change the official exchange rate to accord with the market value because people would lose faith in the system and credibility would be undercut severely, not to mention the power over changing the rate would be viciously contested and subject to corruption. People realized this problem fairly quickly, however, at the time, the standard was popular because certain countries had lots of silver and certain countries had lots of gold and if you wanted to trade with them, it was fairly crucial to have these exchange rates. Britain wanted a bi-metallic currency standard because France had silver and Mexico had gold and they wanted to trade with both of them without extreme transaction costs. When Sir Isaac Newton overvalued gold, he caused silver to be abandoned and sent out to foreign markets where it was cheaper relative to gold. The gold standard took over from the bi-metallic as the central exchange rate mechanism.
+
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
It grew increasingly difficult to change the official exchange rate to agree with the market value because the credibility of the system would be shaken, and people would lose faith in the ability of outside actors to manually regulate the market. Furthermore, the justification for someone who has the power over changing the exchange rate would be viciously contested and seem extremely corrupt.  
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
People understood that there was a problem with Bi-Metallism fairly quickly, however, at the time, the standard seemed enticing. Numerous countries had either mass amounts of silver, or mass amounts of gold, and it was vital to ascertain exchange rates with which to trade. Britain advocated for a bi-metallic currency standard because France had silver and Mexico had gold and Britain wanted to trade with both countries without extreme transaction costs. When Sir Isaac Newton overvalued gold, silver to be abandoned and dispersed in foreign markets where it was cheaper relative to gold. The gold standard took over after the collapse of the bi-metallic standard system as the central exchange rate mechanism.<br>
 +
 
 +
<br><br>
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
<br>

Revision as of 21:21, 28 October 2010

Historically, Bi-Metallism was a currency standard that pegged currencies to either silver or gold. The standard became largely unpopular and died out over the course of the 19th century once governments and empires became aware of its inherent flaws. Its most apparent problem is articulated in Gresham's Law. According to Gresham, once a person becomes aware that there are discrepancies between the market price and the official value of gold or silver, it is extremely easy to take advantage and profit from the system. To better understand this theory, take the example of a mint, which would issue a certain rate for silver and gold. Say the official bank or mint rate for silver is higher than the global market price for silver. Anyone looking to make a profit could trade in their silver for gold at the mint rate and then go to the global market and trade in his or her gold for silver. They would then have more silver than they originally had to begin. A significant profit can be reaped if someone abuses his or her knowledge of this inconsistency. If enough people do this, the circulation of silver or gold could potentially dissolve from the domestic market. Silver generally flows readily into the mint, as the majority of consumers would rather exchange it for gold with the hope of turning a profit in the international market. As a result, gold, as the undervalued currency, gets sucked into foreign markets where it is valued higher. This discrepancy was unavoidable because official values of gold and silver were fixed while the prices of gold and silver fluctuated due to their resource-status. Fluctuation in price level, however, is a natural inevitability of the laws of supply and demand.


It grew increasingly difficult to change the official exchange rate to agree with the market value because the credibility of the system would be shaken, and people would lose faith in the ability of outside actors to manually regulate the market. Furthermore, the justification for someone who has the power over changing the exchange rate would be viciously contested and seem extremely corrupt.


People understood that there was a problem with Bi-Metallism fairly quickly, however, at the time, the standard seemed enticing. Numerous countries had either mass amounts of silver, or mass amounts of gold, and it was vital to ascertain exchange rates with which to trade. Britain advocated for a bi-metallic currency standard because France had silver and Mexico had gold and Britain wanted to trade with both countries without extreme transaction costs. When Sir Isaac Newton overvalued gold, silver to be abandoned and dispersed in foreign markets where it was cheaper relative to gold. The gold standard took over after the collapse of the bi-metallic standard system as the central exchange rate mechanism.