Difference between revisions of "Harmony, Cooperation and Discord"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The basic status of relations between states in the international realm is a vital first step to understanding more complex relationships and potential policy decisions. Whether a state of harmony, cooperation or discord exists between or among a given number of states centers on the question of whether states view other actors’ policies as furthering the attainment of their own goals. Practically speaking, international regimes and their compliance levels are helpful indicators of the presence of harmony, cooperation or discord. Finally, as today’s world is potentially moving away from a hegemonic model and towards a more balanced international power distribution, this discussion of the status of relations between states is especially pertinent. | The basic status of relations between states in the international realm is a vital first step to understanding more complex relationships and potential policy decisions. Whether a state of harmony, cooperation or discord exists between or among a given number of states centers on the question of whether states view other actors’ policies as furthering the attainment of their own goals. Practically speaking, international regimes and their compliance levels are helpful indicators of the presence of harmony, cooperation or discord. Finally, as today’s world is potentially moving away from a hegemonic model and towards a more balanced international power distribution, this discussion of the status of relations between states is especially pertinent. | ||
| − | Complete harmony in the international arena is extremely rare, and perhaps only feasible in a perfect world. Nonetheless, harmony exists when states who are acting in their own interest by consequence happen to also benefit other states in the pursuit of their own goals. If one state’s policies are viewed by other actors as hindering the pursuit of their goals, then harmony will not exist, but rather cooperation or discord. The distinction between the latter two is whether attempts are made by the unpopular actor to modify their policies. If no attempts are made, discord is the result. If attempts are made and all actors’ policies become “significantly more compatible” then cooperation ensues (Keohane, 53). If not, discord is again the result. | + | Complete harmony in the international arena is extremely rare, and perhaps only feasible in a perfect world. Nonetheless, harmony exists when states who are acting in their own interest by consequence happen to also benefit other states in the pursuit of their own goals. If one state’s policies are viewed by other actors as hindering the pursuit of their goals, then harmony will not exist, but rather cooperation or discord. The distinction between the latter two is whether attempts are made by the unpopular actor to modify their policies. If no attempts are made, discord is the result. If attempts are made and all actors’ policies become “significantly more compatible” then cooperation ensues (Keohane, 53). If not, discord is again the result. |
| − | |||
| + | <br> | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 21:50, 15 September 2010
The basic status of relations between states in the international realm is a vital first step to understanding more complex relationships and potential policy decisions. Whether a state of harmony, cooperation or discord exists between or among a given number of states centers on the question of whether states view other actors’ policies as furthering the attainment of their own goals. Practically speaking, international regimes and their compliance levels are helpful indicators of the presence of harmony, cooperation or discord. Finally, as today’s world is potentially moving away from a hegemonic model and towards a more balanced international power distribution, this discussion of the status of relations between states is especially pertinent.
Complete harmony in the international arena is extremely rare, and perhaps only feasible in a perfect world. Nonetheless, harmony exists when states who are acting in their own interest by consequence happen to also benefit other states in the pursuit of their own goals. If one state’s policies are viewed by other actors as hindering the pursuit of their goals, then harmony will not exist, but rather cooperation or discord. The distinction between the latter two is whether attempts are made by the unpopular actor to modify their policies. If no attempts are made, discord is the result. If attempts are made and all actors’ policies become “significantly more compatible” then cooperation ensues (Keohane, 53). If not, discord is again the result.
