Difference between revisions of "Copyright (United States)"

From Media Technology and Culture Change
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Edited, clarified.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Legal rights dictating the ownership and use of media.  Copyright laws generally function by prohibiting unauthorized duplication or derivation of media, although they do not protect the specific concepts or facts contained within that media. However, both parodies and critical analysis are explicitly exempt from the prohibition against using copyrighted media without permission.
+
Legal rights dictating the ownership and use of media.  Copyright laws generally function by prohibiting unauthorized duplication, derivation, distribution, performance, and display of media, although they do not protect the specific concepts or facts contained within that media. However, pursuant to Copyright Law Section 107, both parodies and critical analysis are explicitly exempt from the prohibition against using copyrighted media without permission.
  
As an example, copyright laws prohibit the duplication character of Harry Potter, but this does not mean the use of a male wizard in other works is also prohibited, so long as there are significant differences between the two characters. However, a TV comedy sketch could use the name "Harry Potter" if it is unambiguously part of a parody, and a book about magic in popular culture could use an image from a Harry Potter film if it seems legitimately warranted.
+
As an example, copyright laws prohibit the duplication character of Harry Potter, but this does not mean the use of a male wizard in other works is also prohibited, so long as there are significant differences between the two characters. A TV comedy sketch could use the name "Harry Potter" if it is unambiguously part of a parody, and a book about magic in popular culture could use an image from a Harry Potter film if it seems legitimately warranted.
  
The aim of copyright as written in the Constitution is to promote creativity and progress by protecting the rights of the artist/creator.
+
The "Copyright Clause" of the United States Constitution reads as follows: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." The specific rights consistent with this clause have varied over the last two centuries as legal challenges have continually shaped the scope of copyright powers.
 
 
[[Category:stub]]
 

Revision as of 10:24, 21 May 2007

Legal rights dictating the ownership and use of media. Copyright laws generally function by prohibiting unauthorized duplication, derivation, distribution, performance, and display of media, although they do not protect the specific concepts or facts contained within that media. However, pursuant to Copyright Law Section 107, both parodies and critical analysis are explicitly exempt from the prohibition against using copyrighted media without permission.

As an example, copyright laws prohibit the duplication character of Harry Potter, but this does not mean the use of a male wizard in other works is also prohibited, so long as there are significant differences between the two characters. A TV comedy sketch could use the name "Harry Potter" if it is unambiguously part of a parody, and a book about magic in popular culture could use an image from a Harry Potter film if it seems legitimately warranted.

The "Copyright Clause" of the United States Constitution reads as follows: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." The specific rights consistent with this clause have varied over the last two centuries as legal challenges have continually shaped the scope of copyright powers.