Difference between revisions of "Meeting 1/20/2009"

From MIIS Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
===Both===
 
===Both===
 +
*Clear brand definition -- make people understand who we are
 
*Interactive elements
 
*Interactive elements
 
*Stronger ties to Moodle/other web presences
 
*Stronger ties to Moodle/other web presences
Line 23: Line 24:
 
*Support delivery to mobile devices
 
*Support delivery to mobile devices
 
*Portal to Facebook, iTunes U, Yelp, Flickr, etc.
 
*Portal to Facebook, iTunes U, Yelp, Flickr, etc.
 +
*Streamlined and branded e-commerce solution
 +
*Efficient search solution that displays concise search results
  
 +
==Focus Groups==
 +
*What are the big themes? Are the same things coming up in every group?
  
==Focus Group Notes==
+
==Channels==
 +
*Define what information is in each channel
 +
*People can "tune in" to channels they find interesting
 +
*What are the 3 or 5 or 6 big "channels"?
  
===TLC & IT===
+
==Information Architecture Draft==
 +
*Parallels the way Middlebury looks at architecture
 +
*"above the fold" marketing site/"below the fold" interactive site
 +
*Should there be audience-based navigation? ("current students", "prospective students", etc.)
 +
*Maybe have an "interact" button in the top level
 +
*Importance of wording in our navigation scheme
 +
*Shift the way we think about delivering content -- maybe the reason people can't find stuff is not because of where it is, but how the information is worded/presented
 +
*Consider delivering more content with audio/visual
  
Attendance: Lynn McDonald, Bob Cole, Kristen Byers, AnneMarie Steiger
+
===About===
Focus Group coordinators: Nina Dutra, Leah Gowron
+
*Is an "About" section really necessary? Does it need prominence?
 +
**Consider turning it into a universal footer.
 +
*Rethink fast facts section -- people won't know what content to expect here, they will probably click elsewhere to find what they are looking for
  
This group has been heavily involved with the website redevelopment-preferred to address other areas of growth and transition vs. the pre-determined questions.
+
===Admissions===
  
*Planning:
+
===Academics===
**Website strategy needs someone as a visionary leader to ensure site is consistent and ever-evolving. 
+
*Try for the best of both worlds
**We need to define what is the “clear message” and how do we want to present ourselves?
+
*Don't necessarily include school names in the nav scheme --> maybe just call it "Programs"
**What about a questionnaire on Facebook for prospective students, to see what they want on the website?
+
*Reword "Special Programs" --> no one will click on that because they don't know what content to expect
**No one relates to one communication style—we need diversity in our style.
+
*Idea of having a quiz that finds out what students want to do and links them to a program/degree/etc. based on their interests
**Make the site a fun adventure to roam, to find the info
 
**Change text, site design, homepage monthly or regularly so even if actual data hasn’t changes, the site still seems new and “fresh”.
 
  
*Functions:
+
===Student Services===
**Develop a MIIS online community presence—blogs talking about student experience, faculty discussing topics, alumni sharing resources, etc.
+
*International student services is way too buried considering our international student population
**Communications has to be 2-ways on site.  People need to be able to respond to postings, blogs, etc. Creates an “intelligent” site.
+
**Could be solved if we cross-referenced info by audience (current students, prospective students, international students, alumni, etc.)
**A community blog?
+
*"International Students & Scholars" may be the common terminology most people are looking for
**How to address negative comments that may impact enrollment?  “Diss” on the site allows MIIS to respond, usually will be done by others in the community, not the administration, and the comments can be more “realistic” than “party line”. Comments at all levels demonstrates open communications. Can lead to pride in Institute.
 
  
*Actions:
+
===Administrative Offices===
**Plan a tutorial session for the Board on open-source generation-how to properly use/understand the use of technology for communications, marketing, enrollment, vs. old, traditional formats. “This is how out clients communicate and interact.”
 
**General communications to MIIS community: use uTube or video to get message out-3 pg email with real message buried in rhetoric not useful, and leads to misunderstanding and confusion.
 
 
 
*Follow-up:
 
**Contact Peter Liu (Library) to get on Library staff meeting agenda to seek additional resources.  IT meeting?
 
 
 
==Recruitment, Admissions, Financial Aid, Records==
 
 
 
Present:
 
Tate Miller, Jill Stoffers, Jenny Manseau, Pam Ventura, Regina Lomboy, Sherre Kruft, Devin Luedekke, Amy McGill
 
 
 
*Current website likes:
 
**Graphics/visual appeal
 
**Links to Banner and Directory
 
**Interact and Explore sections
 
**Reduction of wordiness
 
**Cleaner
 
 
 
(summary: summer work on the web site moved us in a positive direction)
 
 
 
*Dislikes:
 
**Not user friendly
 
**Hard to navigate
 
**Needs better map of information
 
**Too many search results
 
**Need larger font
 
**Need portal site (personalized)
 
 
 
(summary: need to emphasize IA, interactivity/customization)
 
 
 
*Impact on recruiting
 
** Prospective student feedback is fairly positive.
 
** 40% of our applicants never inquire – they are getting their info (presumably) from the web and/or word of mouth
 
**Bounce rate is still 49% -- consistent over 2 years
 
 
 
* Would like to see:
 
**Button for transcript requests on homepage
 
**Putting financial aid info with admissions is not logical for current students
 
**Need the ability to interact immediately; pick up rss feeds
 
**User centered elements:
 
***Let alums upload news from the field
 
***Applicants can look up what’s missing from their file
 
***Live chat
 
***Text messages
 
***Pay deposits online, with a confirmation
 
**Banner self-service will make some of this possible
 
**Make language issues (requirements) less confusing
 
**Clear brand definition – make people understand who we are
 

Latest revision as of 20:18, 21 January 2009

Revised List of Requirements

Internal Audiences

  • Login protected customizable personal page that customizes the user experience based on MIIS affiliation
    • Jobs database (students)
    • Banner access to academic records, scheduling (students, faculty)
    • Banner access to budgets (staff)
    • Alumni portal (alumni)
    • Banner access to HR (all)
    • Customizable subscriptions to specific information (e.g., events) via RSS (all)

External Audiences

  • Offer main page + main admissions page in several languages
  • Tell the story: pragmatic idealism
  • Sharpen brand focus: "Be the Solution"

Both

  • Clear brand definition -- make people understand who we are
  • Interactive elements
  • Stronger ties to Moodle/other web presences
  • Integrate content from FirstClass
  • Robust calendar interface
  • Simple, consistent navigation -- no duplicate links
    • Breadcrumbs
  • Support delivery to mobile devices
  • Portal to Facebook, iTunes U, Yelp, Flickr, etc.
  • Streamlined and branded e-commerce solution
  • Efficient search solution that displays concise search results

Focus Groups

  • What are the big themes? Are the same things coming up in every group?

Channels

  • Define what information is in each channel
  • People can "tune in" to channels they find interesting
  • What are the 3 or 5 or 6 big "channels"?

Information Architecture Draft

  • Parallels the way Middlebury looks at architecture
  • "above the fold" marketing site/"below the fold" interactive site
  • Should there be audience-based navigation? ("current students", "prospective students", etc.)
  • Maybe have an "interact" button in the top level
  • Importance of wording in our navigation scheme
  • Shift the way we think about delivering content -- maybe the reason people can't find stuff is not because of where it is, but how the information is worded/presented
  • Consider delivering more content with audio/visual

About

  • Is an "About" section really necessary? Does it need prominence?
    • Consider turning it into a universal footer.
  • Rethink fast facts section -- people won't know what content to expect here, they will probably click elsewhere to find what they are looking for

Admissions

Academics

  • Try for the best of both worlds
  • Don't necessarily include school names in the nav scheme --> maybe just call it "Programs"
  • Reword "Special Programs" --> no one will click on that because they don't know what content to expect
  • Idea of having a quiz that finds out what students want to do and links them to a program/degree/etc. based on their interests

Student Services

  • International student services is way too buried considering our international student population
    • Could be solved if we cross-referenced info by audience (current students, prospective students, international students, alumni, etc.)
  • "International Students & Scholars" may be the common terminology most people are looking for

Administrative Offices